SNG Challenge

Back in 2005 I put together a SNG Challenge and I thought I would post it here in case anyone needed some motivation to play poker.  Never hurts to set some goals, even if they are just short term goals to meet a challenge.  The graph is titled the 6-Max SNG Challenge because I typically play that format, but honestly this will work with 9 or 10 player tables as well.

Bottomline is you start with $5 +.50 SNG’s with a $55 bankroll and go up or down as the guide prescribes below. For instance, if you hit $110 in bankroll then go up to the $10 + $1 SNG’s. If you catch a bad run and fall back down to a $55 bankroll then step back to the $5 SNG’s.

So there you have it. The good part of this challenge is you can only lose $55, so not much downside in the end. The bad is the grid doesn’t leave much room for downswings, thus if you hit a bad run you will probably have to go down in levels as a safety net.  That’s what the guide is for though…to let you know when to make a change up or down.

By the way, disregard the last 4 columns.  Those were my numbers from an old challenge.  You only need to look at the first 4 columns that are detailed under the 6-Max SNG Challenge section.

Good luck!

 

The Wrath Of Gus Hansen

I wrote this post a few years back at my blog, TripJax.com, but thought it would be nice to post it here as well.  It has always been one of my top read posts ever since I started blogging.  So for anyone who has never read it before, enjoy!

I’ve got this poker buddy who went to Vegas during the 2005 WSoP with aspirations of playing in one of the prestigious events. He took $1500 with him, thus could have easily bought in directly to one of the events. Instead he decided to play some of the NL tables and try and build up his roll enough to enter into more than 1 event.

After some up and down play he found himself with about $2000 at, I believe, a 5/10 NL table. A few orbits in, Gus Hansen walks in the room and sits down a couple of seats to his left. After a while of playing, Buddy looks down at AA and raises it up about 3 or 4 times the big blind. When it got around to Gus, he re-raised it to around $200. Buddy re-raised to $500 and Gus immediately went all-in. Buddy called and Gus offered up a smirk on his face as he flipped over his whopping 2 3 offsuit. Before the flop came down Gus said something like, “I figured the only way you could call me was if you had Aces, but I didn’t think you had Aces.”

The flop was an unbelievable 2 3 3, giving Gus an immediate Full House, and slapping Buddy square in the face. Neither the turn or river brought an Ace and just like that buddy was out of chips. Now you would think this is where the story ends, but instead there’s more. Instead of standing up from the table and making his way to the exit, buddy looks at Gus and says, “Man that was a rough beat and I was gonna use that money for a WSoP event…why don’t you give me my money back.” At first Gus just gave his sorry dude look and then kept stacking up his chips. But buddy was pretty persistent and kept on with his “Can I get my money back?” routine. After about a minute Gus told Buddy he’d give him enough to buy back into the table, but that was it.

Thankful for a second chance, Buddy took the chips and continued playing as best he could in hopes to get back enough money to buy into an event. Unfortunately for him, the wrath of Gus struck again after a while and he found himself down to the felt again. This time, however, he had no one to help him with a rebuy. I don’t know how his final hand with Gus went down, but obviously Gus had his way with him and took every last one of his dimes – of which most were Gus’ dimes anyway.

Buddy came home not longer after never getting the chance to play in a 2005 WSoP event. He did, however, have a great story to tell, thus giving me a great story to tell.

Flippin’ Crazy

Quite a while back, Matt Matros wrote an article about a players willingness to take coin flips early in MTT’s. Here is the article from his Cardplayer page…

 

To Flip or Not to Flip: Analysis of an all-in “coin flip” situation early in a tournament

 

If you’ve never read that article before or it has been a while, take a moment to click the link and give it a gander. Back so soon? You must be a speed reader. Anyway, I’ve been thinking about this article lately and thought I would briefly discuss it here. In other words, I have nothing better to write about, so lets discuss something written by someone else.

 

We each have our own strategies, concepts and actions in a tournament. What is considered a correct style of play for one person may be deemed incorrect by another. This difference in style, coupled with the inherent luck/chance factor of the turn of a card, are what keeps poker fascinating to me. If we all played the exact same style of poker and/or there were no luck luck/chance involved, poker would be a pretty dull game.

 

I state the above for a reason. Chances are the type of player you are on the felt will determine whether you agree with the concepts Matt discusses in his article. I, for one, tend to agree with Matt. I believe you have to capitalize on your small edges and, each time you pass on a potential edge, you decrease your chances of winning a tournament. Of course, each time you pass on a potentially game changing all-in situation, you also avoid being knocked out of the tournament. Again, this difference will usually boil down to what style of player you typically are. Of course, we all can change our style of play at any moment, but I’m speaking generalities here folks.

 

In his article, Matt mentions a few arguments people often have for folding in a coin flip situation. I want to add a few to his list.

 

1) Fear of losing money.

2) Fear of negative results.

3) Fear of being judged by your peers.

 

Notice a key word that keeps popping up in the sentences above. The fear factor. Fear in poker is exploited to the max. In fact, I’d say many top pros are so successful because they pinpoint and exploit fear in their opponents. Imagine the online qualifier who won his way into a 10k event via a $50 super satellite. As you know, the first money spots in a tournament typically give you your money back and maybe a small profit. For this online qualifier, 10k is not breaking even, it is a significant amount of take home money based on the original $50 buy-in for the satellite.

 

Enter the experienced player who recognizes the above situation and rips that online player apart with sheer power poker. The pro knows the online qualifier will most likely NOT coin flip for the same reasons the pro WILL coin flip. The pro is not afraid to lose his money, have short term negative results, or be judged by his peers. On the other hand, the online qualifier can’t imagine flying to an event, getting stuck in a tough decision early, and having to go home to his family and friends and explain how he went out in the 1st hour when his QQ was cracked by AK.

 

I don’t know about you, but I have given up +EV or coin flip situations for each of the above reasons before. And I must say, there were times where I regretted my decision tremendously. I know there were times that my decision ultimately cost me a chance to go deeper in a tournament. Sure I held on longer because there was no chance I would be knocked out on that particular hand, but that does not make my decision right. And yes, maybe there was a time that I ended up finishing well in a tournament where I avoided a coin flip situation early. Still, I’m trying to maximize my edges over the long haul and I think analyzing these situations more closely makes sense.

 

I’d like to now take a step back and look at Matt’s article from a slightly different angle. The example in his article is regarding a large buy-in, multi-day event with, most likely, long levels of 1 to 2 hours per level. Now imagine taking that general scenario, but having a tournament structure and blind level that would make it finish in hours, not days. I’m talking about your typical online tournament or lower buy-in MTT or home game.

 

When you play a tournament that will end in hours, not days, your chances of finding a better spot to double up often become few and far between. Passing on getting your chips in with an edge in online tournaments becomes an even more dire situation than Matt’s article prescribes. Now as I’ve mentioned before, I’m not exactly a numbers guy so I tend to let the others do the calculating. However, I see Matt’s points and I personally think if I pass on my small edges in the tournaments I play, I am costing myself money in the long run.

 

Of course, the beauty of basically everything in life, including poker, writing and theories, is that we can choose to have our own opinion and we can disagree. If I stuff my chips in the middle because I feel I have a slight edge, then that is what is right to me. If I was correct and win, more power to me. If I was correct and lose, that’s just the way the cookie crumbles. The beauty (and subsequently the beast) of poker is that I can also be incorrect and still walk away with the chips. As you and I both know, it happens ALL THE TIME.

 

I remember hearing a quote on ESPN once by a football coach that went something like this…”There are three results that can happen when you pass the ball and two of them are negative.” This is clearly a coach who probably builds his program around a running attack and a strong defense.

 

What does this have to do with poker you ask? Well, honestly nothing, other than the quote makes me think about a poker situation. When you push your chips into the middle and announce “all-in,” there are only so many results that can occur. Let’s take a look.

 

1) You are ahead and win.

2) You are ahead and lose.

3) You are behind and win.

4) You are behind and lose.

 

Now that is obviously pretty basic, and truly more goes into it than that, depending on the situation, but you get the idea. But think about the above scenarios for a moment. There are not many situations in life that I can think of off the top of my head that reward an incorrect decision. Yet, in poker, it happens all the time. With #1, you made the correct decision and got the result you were hoping for. With #2, you made the right decision and were at the mercy of the cards. You can’t control the actions of others and can only hope to get your chips in the middle with the best of it.

 

With #3, you ultimately made the wrong decision, but walked away with the chips. With #4, you made the wrong decision and “got what you deserved.” In essence of the 4 situations, only one results in you making an incorrect decision and paying the price. I believe, in the end, if you make the right decisions and exploit both your small and large edges, you will ultimately be rewarded. You can’t control what other players do, so you might as well try and exploit as many edges as possible and put yourself in a situation to win more often than not. Passing on your edges, no matter how small or large, can become very costly.

 

Let’s finish this post up with a few things I will no longer do…

 

I will no longer play poker with fear. I will not fear negative results. You can’t win every time and, especially with MTT’s, more often than not you will lose. However, I can and will pinpoint and exploit other players fear, even at the cost of losing in certain small edge scenarios.

 

I will not fear losing my poker money. This is easy by playing within my bankroll and playing only with money I can afford to lose. If I fear losing my buy-in I am costing myself loads of money in the long run. This train of thought will find me limping into the money instead of storming the final table.

 

I will not fear being judged by my peers. That I’m aware of, I’ve yet to be the recipient of one of Hoy’s rants, but I certainly have no fear of putting myself in a situation that I feel correct about at the cost of being fonked out. Whether my decision is correct or whether I am ultimately a fonkey, I will not fear the result. Don’t get me wrong, I love Hoy’s rants and can’t believe I’ve yet to be one of his victims. I’m just using him as an illustration as his posts are a perfect example of letting the fear of what others think change the way you play a particular hand. I won’t let that happen. If I make a fonkey move, so be it. If I make a decision that results in my exploiting a small edge that looks crazy, so be it. I won’t lose any sleep over it. I will not fear going out first in a tournament if I feel I made the right decision in a particular situation.

 

Yikes, this post has turned into a self help nightmare. I think I should shut down now before I start looking like a wackjob. I know, I know, too late for that. Anyway, I’d love to here your thoughts on this subject. Like I said, to each his own, but of course, I’m right. I keed, I keed.